Which contingency plans are required in the IDP?

• A. Safe havens, civil disturbances, overt attack, follow-on ID forces, no-notice presidential aircraft, anti-hijack/robbery, bomb threat, hostage, expedited emergency entry, distinguished visitors, A&AE shipments, unidentified aircraft, transuranic waste, workplace/school violence, Prime Nuclear Airlift Force.
• B. A single contingency plan for a flood and earthquake.
• C. Contingency plans are not required for IDP.
• D. Only a plan for chemical spill response.

Answer: (B)

An IDP uses an integrated approach to preparedness, so a single, comprehensive contingency plan that covers multiple major hazards is required. Having one plan for flood and earthquake keeps responses consistent, ensures clear command and control, and makes efficient use of resources and coordination with other entities. The alternative of having many separate plans for a long list of specific events would create fragmentation, potential conflicts, and confusion during an incident. Saying no contingency plans are required contradicts standard readiness practices, and restricting to only a chemical spill misses other plausible threats the installation might face. So a single, unified contingency plan that addresses major hazards like flooding and earthquakes best reflects the IDP approach.